Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

gnucap:user:asco_for_gnucap [2015/12/11 15:39]
127.0.0.1 external edit
gnucap:user:asco_for_gnucap [2018/04/20 11:19] (current)
felixs
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 while the functionality of asco could well be integrated into gnucap, it seems easier to do it this way. also it always makes sense to provide alternatives, considering that asco is quite worthless without a simulator. otoh, asco then can be use to benchmark gnucap, motivate measurement extensions for gnucap etc. while the functionality of asco could well be integrated into gnucap, it seems easier to do it this way. also it always makes sense to provide alternatives, considering that asco is quite worthless without a simulator. otoh, asco then can be use to benchmark gnucap, motivate measurement extensions for gnucap etc.
 +
 +====Why Not Asco?====
 +
 +With gnucap-python it has become very simple to run gnucap in combination with external optimisation algorithms. python is not only much easier to use and more common than ASCO, but also more flexible. Reasonable optimisation libraries (such as NLopt) naturally provide python bindings.
  
 ====Implementation==== ====Implementation====
gnucap/user/asco_for_gnucap.txt · Last modified: 2018/04/20 11:19 by felixs
 
Recent changes RSS feed Donate Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0 Valid CSS Run by Debian Driven by DokuWiki